As you already know, I’m a Recreational Therapist. I am not a certified teacher. However, we, RTs do provide some education. In my case, I teach social skills, life skills, calming skills, problem-solving skills, as well as many more. Our allied professionals are also educators, too. Here is an example, nurses, providing nursing education to their patients.
Why am I talking about education at my Recreational Therapy blog?
Teachers are under a lot of pressure for performance.
I discovered this from watching the 2010 documentary “Waiting for Superman.”
Wow – that documentary is unbelievable.
The major point that I got was that the United States is ranked in the 20s among nations in major subjects like Math and Science.
Bill Gates goes on the record to say the problem with companies in America is that they’re having to look outside of the United States to fill high-paying positions because there aren’t enough Americans who are smart enough to do the job.
Wow, we’ve got a problem and guess who they blame? The answer is: teachers.
Okay, that is the teaching profession.
We’re in the Recreational Therapy profession.
I think this documentary could teach us RTs a lot.
First, we must produce results. Teachers and schools that don’t perform and have low graduates are criticized in the video.
Teachers get paid about the same regardless if they’re an outstanding teacher, mediocre teacher, or poor-performing teacher.
I’m not sure if that is the case with RTs. As far as I’m aware, we, RTs don’t have contracts like teachers have.
However, I do have a lot of passion for RT and want us as a profession to be outstanding. I’m a big advocate for what we do as Recreational Therapists to help the people who we serve. After all, The American Therapeutic Recreation Association (ATRA) had identified me as an “Advocate of the Year” in 2005.
My big challenge to all of us in Recreational Therapy is to provide outstanding services and to go the extra mile to being about the best outcomes possible for our clients/ patients/ people who we serve.
One bad recreational therapist could leave a bad impression for the entire profession.
Here is an example. I heard this story when I was in graduate school for Recreation Therapy. A nursing home or rehabilitation hospital had a lobby area with a television and VCR. They had several patients sitting in wheelchairs in this area. Apparently, they were calling this “Recreational Therapy and Cinematherapy.”
I’m not sure of the full situation. But simply playing a VCR tape for people in a room does not consist of “Recreational Therapy.” That seems nearly fraudulent to me.
There is a big difference between “Recreation” and “Recreational Therapy.” They’re not the same. The U.S. Dept. of Labor even clarifies in “The Occupational Outlook Handbook.” In Recreational Therapy, they say that “Recreation workers” are identified elsewhere in the manual. Simply providing recreation activities does not make it therapy.
This is the same for many other professions, too. Being a caregiver does not mean a person is providing nursing care.
Recreational Therapist consists of several things, including:
A Physician’s order for a clinical setting: rehabilitation, skilled nursing, psychiatric.
An assessment that gains information regarding the person’s strengths and areas of needed improvement in the following domains: social, physical, emotional, cognitive, and leisure.
A treatment plan (developed with patient/ person served) to address her (or his) areas of needed improvement and to build upon strengths. Include patient/ person’ served consent to treatment.
RT or TR interventions that are purposely provided to assist the patient/ person served with meeting his (or her) treatment goals.
Evaluation of outcomes.
For more information, I’d recommend for a Recreational Therapist to read ATRA’s “Standards or Practice.” A copy of this manual can be purchased at the ATRA web-site here:
http://atra-online.com/storelistitem.cfm?itemnumber=19
Here are two books by Jim Collins (a leadership expert) that may be interesting to read. They’re both books that argue that “good” is the enemy. The goal is to be great.
One book is on managing a company and one book is about principals of schools. I’m certain that we, RTs could take useful ideas from both books and apply them to our practice in order to move from “good” to “great.”
Who wants to settle for being a good RT when they could aim for becoming a great RT?